Monday, 2 May 2016

God's name is surprisingly despised by many Christians preachers.

What is God's name? Is it God, GOD, LORD, Creator, etc? If you are one of the many who claim to be Christians, then we must be talking about the God of Israel. The God written about in the Old Testament or Tanakh to the Jews.

Does he have a name?

Yes.

taken from the website on top corner of the image.

According to this website. God's name is Jehovah. However, there is much dispute about this claim by opponents of Jehovah's Witness adherents. And rightly so, because the letter J with its corresponding phonetic sound does not appear in the modern and even in ancient Hebrew characters. Hence, it is most likely that God's name is not [J]ehovah.

The point here, is that God indeed has a name.






So if it isn't Jehovah, then what is it?

YHVH, so it says on this website. Others even contend IHVH, YHWH, IHWH, or even IEUE as being the correct transliteration. Nevertheless, their claim of the name being ineffable, meaning, cannot be spoken or pronounced, appears to be correct. Nobody seems to be able to say this name correctly.






There are even ones who are quite militant who spread that this name is of an pagan god Yaw, it shouldn't be used at all, according to them, the right name is Lord or Adonai.


I am not going into a full discussion on how wrong these people are right now. Am citing the website as proof that there indeed are people who believe that God shouldn't and that he doesn't have a name, i will be using this later on.

We are aware that there are shorter variations of this name i.e. Yehu, a one time King of Israel who annihilated Ahab's wife Jezebel, among others.





















So how is Jehu/Yehu formed if the Yeh/Yah isn't YHVH/JHVH? Should it not have read Adonihu or Lordhu instead?

Another even shorter variation of YHVH is this one:


























Now why are we certain that those opposing the existence of this name are wrong?

First and foremost, they admit that the Messiah's name is Jesus.









Now, how did this English name for the Saviour came about when Jesus is not a Hebrew name?














This website states that Jesus, Joshua, and Yeshua are basically the same name. Notice the meaning of this name:
















So as you can see, the name which is accepted as the name of Christ by opponents of the Divine Name are clearly wrong. Otherwise the name of Christ would have read LORDsus and not Jesus.

This is nothing new, because even in the first few chapters of Genesis, there appears to be One who omitted God's name.

















The contempt for this name is not new.

Remember that the Name was given to the Son:









Hence, i have noticed in the prayers during worship service of the Iglesia Ni Cristo [Church of Christ], there is always praise and worship rendered to the Most Holy Name of God the Father, also to the Son, for he carries the Name. The Name given him by God himself.

Yeshua/Joshua/Jesus means YHVH saves.

Thursday, 21 April 2016

Nangungutang nanaman ang Gobyerno! Bad News para sa lahat.

Ang nasa ibaba po ay isang video na ang layon ay ipaliwanag kung paano nagkakaroon at saan at papaano ginagawa ang pera. Subali't habang atin pong sundan ang nasabing video, lalong lumalalim at at nawawala na tayo at nalilito sa kanilang mga paliwanag. Ayon na rin po sa mga nagsasaliksik ukol sa bagay na ito, sinasadyang ginawang komplikado ang economics ng bansa, at hindi itinuturo sa paaralan, sa layuning maging tanga, ignorante, at bobo ang mga tao habang patuloy silang pinagnanakawan ng mga taong sobrang yaman na sila ring may ari at nagpapatakbo ng sistemang ito.


Kaya't ang nilalaman ng blog na ito ay ibig ipaliwanag kung papaano at bakit lubog sa utang ang mga gobyerno. 

Kahit po ang mayayamang bansa ay lubog din sa katakot-takot na halaga ng salapi:



Pansinin po natin sa video sa ibaba i fast-forward po natin sa 18 minutes at 50 seconds running ay ipinapaliwanag ng presenter na tapos na ang pangungutang ng Gobyerno at natanggap na nga nila ang 'Pera' na siya ring ipinrint, sa kaso ng bansang Pilipinas, ay ng Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas o BSP.


Teka muna, sino ba ang may ari ng Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas? Hindi ba ito ay sakop ng Gobyerno ng Pilipinas?

Eto po ang Sagot ayon na rin po sa Philippine official government website:

Ayan po, sila na rin po mismo ang may sabi na ang BSP ay independent at may autonomy o hiwalay at may sariling desisyon ito at hindi sakop ng Presidente, Kongreso, at Uficina ng mga Hukom. 

Ang layon ng pagbuo ng BSP ay para raw gawing stable o sigurado ang presyo ng mga bilihin? sigurado para kanino? Siempre, para sa mga may ari ng BSP nang sa gayon ay sa bawat benta ng anuman na ginagamitan ng opisyal na pera ng bansa, ay may kagat sila. Di po ba? heheh.


Sa nasabing parte ng video sa itaas ay ginastos na ng gobyerno ang inutang na pera mula sa Bangko at siyang makikita nating paggawa ng mga pulitiko halimbawa ng mga kalsada [na halos hindi matapos tapos], mga proyekto sa DPWH, DOH, DOE, DOLE, at iba pa. Ang mga proyektong ito na nakikita na, o malamang ay ibinulsa na rin, ng ating mga mata ay siyang hudyat na lalong nababaon sa utang ang bansa natin. 

Subalit hindi naman ang mga pulitiko ang siyang magbabayad ng utang na iyan, kundi ang karaniwang mamamayang Pilipino. Ngunit paano nila ginagawa ito?

Sa kaugnayan ng BSP, ito ay sa pamamagitan ng mga napakaraming at sinasadyang panglito na tax, mga idineklara at palihim. 

Ang pag taas ng mga presyo ng bilihin ay siyang TAX na HINDI HALATA. Tumataas ang presyo ng asukal o bigas, hindi dahil sa kakaunti lang ang supply, kundi may ipinatong na TAX dito ang Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas na pag-aari ng mga ultra Yaman.

Kapag may nakikita na tayong mga ganitong gawain, gaya ng sa ibaba:


Aba! masamang signal po iyan. Dahil ang ibig sabihin niyan, sa loob ng 5-10 taon ay lalong tataas ang mga presyo ng bilihin, hospital bills, LAHAT!

Ganyan po ang sistema ng ekonomiyang pambuong daigdig, ang kahirapan ng karaniwang mamamayan sa ganitong uri ng raket ay garantisado. Sadyang nakakapanglumo ng damdamin ang ganitong katotohanan, subalit mas maigi naman po ang alam ang totoo kesa bulag di po ba?

[masamang tawa isingit dito ------> _______________]




Monday, 11 April 2016

Bad press timing for Elitists running for president in the Philippines, but all hope may have escaped this Country.

Here we go again. Same ol' same ol' narrative, but the majority of people will predictably keep quiet and just go on with their deplorable lives all over again.

This story had been re-run a 'thousand' times, but the powers-that-be who run this dilapidated country in South East Asia a.k.a. the Philippines, always had the upper hand of shutting down any story being spun in its favour. Watch the YouTube clip below where savages in uniform are firing at the poor farmers exercising their 'democratic' right to protest - this incident was aptly called the Mendiola Massacre.


As the familiar story goes, the farmers went on strike because of blah blah... after which they were branded as terrorists, communists, and all sorts of evil descriptive labels were latched on to them and so justified their slaughter. Needless to say, dead bodies piled high and dumped to rot in God knows where. The masses were, as expected, indifferent and got on with their lamentable lives with the help of effective brainwashing tactics by ABS-CBN in their lying propaganda to protect the Aquino-Cojuangco elite that those dead protesters were just scum that needed wiped out.

Now the story is being replayed, but there could not have been a worse time for it to happen as election is fast approaching. This time in Kidapawan, the farmers are on a protest, obviously for sensible reasons of being treated like dirt, as usual. 

We see the slight on Mar Roxas' remarks with regards to the farmers on protest.

Here's a caption of Manila Bulletin's article:


This megalomaniacal buffoon clearly has no interest whatsoever in the farmer's plight, as he's more concerned of 'other groups' involved in supposedly 'exploiting' these gullible farmers, of whom some were killed. Is it because they let themselves be exploited that they rightfully ended up dead Mar? Is this message acceptable coming from a candidate who wants to run the Philippines even further to the ground? Understandably so, considering you're an aboriginal patrician of this country. The plebs are just, well... plebs.

So what does President PNoy Aquino has to say about this?

Cebudaily Inquirer has this to say:


Dodgy eh? Maybe not. Was his Mama, the late Cory Aquino not culpable for the Mendiola Massacre in the mid 80s? Like mother like son. Cut from the same cloth they are.

Meanwhile, independent presidentiable Rodrigo Duterte has this to say according to Inquirer:

Duterte's strategy appears symptomatic alleviation of the problem, but who can go against mother nature? And what else can anyone do to ease the suffering of these poor farmers?

We can clearly see the ideological divide between these two presidentiables. Crony Capitalism vs Socialism, or is it Populism?

As per the same news outfit, there's a warning issued about Rodrigo Duterte by you know who.


For those who are still sleepwalking, wake up! There never was a Democracy in the Philippines since Marcos' 1972 Martial Law. Duterte might turn into a Marcos, but President Lee Kwan Yew was a dictator and look at Singapore:

These goons running the show in the Philippines love to squeal like pigs in our ears so we can't hear anything else but their defence of their version of 'Democracy'. Their mouthpiece ABS-CBN will tirelessly do exactly that, coercively compromise the public's brain with unrelenting rapid increment of destructive sonic wave as they howl 'Marcos' has risen from the dead.

Demokrasya, demokrasya! Pero sino ang nakikinabang sa sinasabing demokrasya?! Sila sila ring mga ganid na baboy!

If there is such a thing as Democracy in the Philippines? Why do we have to put up with Kris Aquino's annoying whine on TV on a daily basis? Her vapid madness would put you on Lithium, or worse a gun in your hand pointing at your own head to end the suffering once and for all.

After all is said and done, am I going to explicitly endorse Rody Duterte as president? 

No. He's human, he will be corrupt, as all is corruptible.

It appears that there is no hope for this country any more. Its fate is sealed in mediocrity, poverty, and curse. The same is true all over the world, we are all going down. This is nature, decay is inevitable. Death swallows us all.



So lively! So pessimist. Sad but True.








Sunday, 3 April 2016

So, did Jesus Lie?



The oldest Christian church claims to be the one true church. They say that they have always been the one and only church established by Jesus Christ. According to them, no one can else can claim to be the true church since they have stayed true to the teachings handed to them by Christ himself.

They also lay claim to the fact that Jesus would never abandon the church he himself built. They cite the passage below.




That would have been all okay, we never would have to have any doubts about the claims of the oldest Christian religious establishment.

However, there is something that needs to be examined. Jesus mentioned the 'other sheep.' and with this other sheep, they will become one flock with one shepherd.


So now, the catholic church has a big problem. They claim to be the oldest and original christian church, so where will this other flock under one shepherd fit in? And since they have always maintained to be the original, meaning from the fold of which these other sheep do not belong, then they have implicitly denied any possibility of the other flock to come into the picture, or existence if i may add. Is this church able to overturn the words of Jesus who they claim as their god? Did Jesus lie about what he said in John 10:16?

And what is a flock anyway?

The flock refers to the Church. According to Christ, the 'other sheep' WILL become one Church with one Shepherd in John 10:16.

But why the need for another flock?



Wolves?


Everyone was sleeping?


What does it mean when everyone is sleeping the enemy or false prophet disguised as a lamb will come and will not spare the flock?


Ah yes. After the crucifixion, the prince of this world will come and destroy the temple, the Church of Christ. 


But they will argue 'what about the promise of Christ to never leave the church?' But has the catholic church stayed true and not altered the teachings of Jesus?

You examine that for yourself. If the teachings have indeed changed, then someone has gotten in and allowed it to happen, the biblical prophecies have then come to pass as surely they would.

So where is the other sheep?

They are now here, and the door is open for anyone no matter the ethnic, social, religious background, All are welcome to come in.























Wednesday, 30 March 2016

Unbridled Capitalism's poster boy - The Philippines



The Philippines is a country rich in resources both manpower: skilled, and unskilled, as well as in natural resources. Seasoned politicians are highly intelligent, leaving universities with high honours while majority of the citizens are hard-working and determined to uplift their lives. A picture of a likely rich and progressive country.



However, nothing can be farther from the truth. As the world already knows, a  great majority of its citizens are in poverty, most of the so-called middle class cannot even afford to buy their own houses.




Jobs are scarce and the population growth has run amok, there are currently over 100 million Filipinos today in a total land mass of 300,000 square kilometres. Overcrowded much?

So what has gone wrong? From second to Japan to down the drain and still going. Could this simply be the fate of this country? Forsaken? Majority of its people cursed to live and die in poverty if i may say?






Ah! But this cannot be by chance alone.

So lets study the two main strata of the Philippine society and the mechanism employed to maintain the status quo. So you will then see why majority of Filipinos are poor.

The Farm is the country itself where you have two kinds of people in it.



1. The Ruling Class: Farmers.

Their names are synonymous with fame, wealth and power. They have always been there for decades if not hundreds of years. They are politicians, businessmen, media moguls, titans of commerce. They are deadly, cunning, manipulative, the embodiment of Evil of biblical proportions of what the apostle Paul calls as 'in the Flesh'.

1a. The Upper Middle Class only exist by toleration of the farmers. Either due to their own talent in managing their finance and trade, or through friendship, acquaintance, or distant blood ties with the high and mighty. These are used as tools by the royalty as farm wardens.






* The Mechanisms Employed.



a. Media/Entertainment - The Farmers have very strong influence over, have connections, if not direct control of powerful and influential Media outlets i.e. ABS-CBN. The other media outfits are no better as they are tied to the same masters. Recycling the same old storyline of glorifying the unattainable lives and even 'looks' of the rich and famous. These are Pumped into the hapless cerebra of the masses day in and day out. Banal TV programmes and soaps are beamed onto the eyeballs of the citizens with sublime messages of the regular pinoy as being  ugly, stupid, and worthless. Locally made films simply rehash the same tired narrative with great effect. That is of scarring the Filipino psyche, the damage may probably last forever.



b. Religion - with a number of the politicians and business moguls having genetic links to the ere Spanish Empire and Friars of the ancient days, they have this Church telling the people to breed like rabbits so to obtain massive numbers of zombie brained voters to harvest for their self-serving objectives. And so the the hive of the gullible exponentially increase.



c. Education - with chronic poverty restricting entry to better private schools, purposely overcrowded classrooms in state funded primary and secondary schools is hardly conducive for learning, hence many of the youth are distracted and ultimately drop out  leaving them under-educated and this is 'good for business' because they become quite easy targets for predation by the upper class in their adult age.


d. Lawlessness and DisOrder:  squatting is illegal in the Philippines but is being perpetrated or 'condoned' by the overlord ruling class and their underling farm wardens to secure massive numbers of voters in their constituency. The deprived masses are Continually baited with Promises of better lives every election season.



e. Employment - scarce, but Not by accident. Massive numbers of Filipinos are driven to work overseas to find work. Educated ones mostly, probably to reduce the risk of having competition in their own turf. The under-educated exodus appears to be incidental but not at all without benefits for the upper class as you will see below.



f. Commerce - gargantuan enthralling malls, private hopitals, and private educational insitutions are everywhere in major cities of the republic. You'd wonder where are they getting the customers from when majority of the people are unable to afford?



2. The Underclass: The Cattle.



Ah yes. From the cash sent home by the overseas Filipino workers to their relatives. These concrete monstrosities aka Malls and the like  are but funnels of hard earned money by people in Exodus  long deprived of proper education, health services, and were intentionally made poor and driven away to serve as slaves in other countries by the upper class who remain worshipped, envied, looked up to by the animals of the this farm even to this very day.

The end justifies the means -》 for the ultra Rich in Pilipinas. Capitalism at its best. The Philippines as its poster boy on a micro level.

Greed Works!

Wednesday, 23 March 2016

Exodus 3:14 'I AM WHO I AM' vs 'I WILL BE WHAT I WILL BE'

Most english bibles translate Exodus 3:14 in this manner:


This verse conveniently coincides with the I am in the New Testament from Jesus' speech. See John chapter 8 verse 58. Thereby implying that he is the same I AM in Exodus 3:14, which to their mind proves that Jesus is the God who was speaking to Moses in the second book of the Tanakh.

However, information is now free, especially on the internet. Did God really say I AM in Exodus 3:14? Before we answer this questions, lets take a look at a much maligned alternative rendition of the same verse by a sect which almost every mainstream brand of Christianity despises - the Jehova's Witness. I am not promoting this sect for I do not subscribe to their teachings. Let's see their rendition below.


Interesting indeed. It is quite different from most renditions of English bibles. Trinitarians loathe this version as it takes away one of their proofs that Jesus is indeed God. Most people know that this sect does not agree with a trinitarian view of Christianity. If you look at it from an interlinear translation of the bible from Hebrew to English, you will notice that Jehovah's Witness rendition of Exodus 3:14 is in fact closer to the truth.

What's missing here is the word 'Choose' which appears to be added in the Jehovah's Witness bible. The opponents of this rendition will argue that this does not make sense. What doesn't make sense is the fact that Ehyah which translates to I WILL BE can also be found in Exodus 3:12


Notice how the King James bible renders it just as it is in Exodus 3:12 - I WILL BE and not I AM. So why the change from I will be to I am in verse 14?

To put an end to this argument. Let's take a look at the rendition of the verse in dispute from a Jewish perspective. After all, the first five books of the Old Testament also known as the Torah was handed to them.


So there you are. It isn't I AM at all, but Do you still wish to believe the Lie?



  

Tuesday, 22 March 2016

Presstitution happens not only in the Philippines. This is a worldwide phenomenon.





Let's just be honest about this. People sometimes think that things happen only in their country of residence. But the truth is, Presstitution, where the media lays on its back as its paymaster, usually the Oligarchs running a country, meaning the government, is rampant.

Case in point would be the United States. Press outfits like CBS Fox, among others, are mere mouthpiece of the government. Any media corporation that goes against the 'official' views being shoved down the throats of the masses through mainstream media are choked to oblivion. Freedom of speech eh? But how do they do it? Obviously that wouldn't be done Putin's or Communist China's way of doing things. More subtle one could say, but very effective in delivering the effect of silencing the bleating of the lambs.

The image above is just a mirror of what happens worldwide. So don't fret about it. It's perfectly normal.