Thursday 21 April 2016

Nangungutang nanaman ang Gobyerno! Bad News para sa lahat.

Ang nasa ibaba po ay isang video na ang layon ay ipaliwanag kung paano nagkakaroon at saan at papaano ginagawa ang pera. Subali't habang atin pong sundan ang nasabing video, lalong lumalalim at at nawawala na tayo at nalilito sa kanilang mga paliwanag. Ayon na rin po sa mga nagsasaliksik ukol sa bagay na ito, sinasadyang ginawang komplikado ang economics ng bansa, at hindi itinuturo sa paaralan, sa layuning maging tanga, ignorante, at bobo ang mga tao habang patuloy silang pinagnanakawan ng mga taong sobrang yaman na sila ring may ari at nagpapatakbo ng sistemang ito.


Kaya't ang nilalaman ng blog na ito ay ibig ipaliwanag kung papaano at bakit lubog sa utang ang mga gobyerno. 

Kahit po ang mayayamang bansa ay lubog din sa katakot-takot na halaga ng salapi:



Pansinin po natin sa video sa ibaba i fast-forward po natin sa 18 minutes at 50 seconds running ay ipinapaliwanag ng presenter na tapos na ang pangungutang ng Gobyerno at natanggap na nga nila ang 'Pera' na siya ring ipinrint, sa kaso ng bansang Pilipinas, ay ng Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas o BSP.


Teka muna, sino ba ang may ari ng Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas? Hindi ba ito ay sakop ng Gobyerno ng Pilipinas?

Eto po ang Sagot ayon na rin po sa Philippine official government website:

Ayan po, sila na rin po mismo ang may sabi na ang BSP ay independent at may autonomy o hiwalay at may sariling desisyon ito at hindi sakop ng Presidente, Kongreso, at Uficina ng mga Hukom. 

Ang layon ng pagbuo ng BSP ay para raw gawing stable o sigurado ang presyo ng mga bilihin? sigurado para kanino? Siempre, para sa mga may ari ng BSP nang sa gayon ay sa bawat benta ng anuman na ginagamitan ng opisyal na pera ng bansa, ay may kagat sila. Di po ba? heheh.


Sa nasabing parte ng video sa itaas ay ginastos na ng gobyerno ang inutang na pera mula sa Bangko at siyang makikita nating paggawa ng mga pulitiko halimbawa ng mga kalsada [na halos hindi matapos tapos], mga proyekto sa DPWH, DOH, DOE, DOLE, at iba pa. Ang mga proyektong ito na nakikita na, o malamang ay ibinulsa na rin, ng ating mga mata ay siyang hudyat na lalong nababaon sa utang ang bansa natin. 

Subalit hindi naman ang mga pulitiko ang siyang magbabayad ng utang na iyan, kundi ang karaniwang mamamayang Pilipino. Ngunit paano nila ginagawa ito?

Sa kaugnayan ng BSP, ito ay sa pamamagitan ng mga napakaraming at sinasadyang panglito na tax, mga idineklara at palihim. 

Ang pag taas ng mga presyo ng bilihin ay siyang TAX na HINDI HALATA. Tumataas ang presyo ng asukal o bigas, hindi dahil sa kakaunti lang ang supply, kundi may ipinatong na TAX dito ang Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas na pag-aari ng mga ultra Yaman.

Kapag may nakikita na tayong mga ganitong gawain, gaya ng sa ibaba:


Aba! masamang signal po iyan. Dahil ang ibig sabihin niyan, sa loob ng 5-10 taon ay lalong tataas ang mga presyo ng bilihin, hospital bills, LAHAT!

Ganyan po ang sistema ng ekonomiyang pambuong daigdig, ang kahirapan ng karaniwang mamamayan sa ganitong uri ng raket ay garantisado. Sadyang nakakapanglumo ng damdamin ang ganitong katotohanan, subalit mas maigi naman po ang alam ang totoo kesa bulag di po ba?

[masamang tawa isingit dito ------> _______________]




Monday 11 April 2016

Bad press timing for Elitists running for president in the Philippines, but all hope may have escaped this Country.

Here we go again. Same ol' same ol' narrative, but the majority of people will predictably keep quiet and just go on with their deplorable lives all over again.

This story had been re-run a 'thousand' times, but the powers-that-be who run this dilapidated country in South East Asia a.k.a. the Philippines, always had the upper hand of shutting down any story being spun in its favour. Watch the YouTube clip below where savages in uniform are firing at the poor farmers exercising their 'democratic' right to protest - this incident was aptly called the Mendiola Massacre.


As the familiar story goes, the farmers went on strike because of blah blah... after which they were branded as terrorists, communists, and all sorts of evil descriptive labels were latched on to them and so justified their slaughter. Needless to say, dead bodies piled high and dumped to rot in God knows where. The masses were, as expected, indifferent and got on with their lamentable lives with the help of effective brainwashing tactics by ABS-CBN in their lying propaganda to protect the Aquino-Cojuangco elite that those dead protesters were just scum that needed wiped out.

Now the story is being replayed, but there could not have been a worse time for it to happen as election is fast approaching. This time in Kidapawan, the farmers are on a protest, obviously for sensible reasons of being treated like dirt, as usual. 

We see the slight on Mar Roxas' remarks with regards to the farmers on protest.

Here's a caption of Manila Bulletin's article:


This megalomaniacal buffoon clearly has no interest whatsoever in the farmer's plight, as he's more concerned of 'other groups' involved in supposedly 'exploiting' these gullible farmers, of whom some were killed. Is it because they let themselves be exploited that they rightfully ended up dead Mar? Is this message acceptable coming from a candidate who wants to run the Philippines even further to the ground? Understandably so, considering you're an aboriginal patrician of this country. The plebs are just, well... plebs.

So what does President PNoy Aquino has to say about this?

Cebudaily Inquirer has this to say:


Dodgy eh? Maybe not. Was his Mama, the late Cory Aquino not culpable for the Mendiola Massacre in the mid 80s? Like mother like son. Cut from the same cloth they are.

Meanwhile, independent presidentiable Rodrigo Duterte has this to say according to Inquirer:

Duterte's strategy appears symptomatic alleviation of the problem, but who can go against mother nature? And what else can anyone do to ease the suffering of these poor farmers?

We can clearly see the ideological divide between these two presidentiables. Crony Capitalism vs Socialism, or is it Populism?

As per the same news outfit, there's a warning issued about Rodrigo Duterte by you know who.


For those who are still sleepwalking, wake up! There never was a Democracy in the Philippines since Marcos' 1972 Martial Law. Duterte might turn into a Marcos, but President Lee Kwan Yew was a dictator and look at Singapore:

These goons running the show in the Philippines love to squeal like pigs in our ears so we can't hear anything else but their defence of their version of 'Democracy'. Their mouthpiece ABS-CBN will tirelessly do exactly that, coercively compromise the public's brain with unrelenting rapid increment of destructive sonic wave as they howl 'Marcos' has risen from the dead.

Demokrasya, demokrasya! Pero sino ang nakikinabang sa sinasabing demokrasya?! Sila sila ring mga ganid na baboy!

If there is such a thing as Democracy in the Philippines? Why do we have to put up with Kris Aquino's annoying whine on TV on a daily basis? Her vapid madness would put you on Lithium, or worse a gun in your hand pointing at your own head to end the suffering once and for all.

After all is said and done, am I going to explicitly endorse Rody Duterte as president? 

No. He's human, he will be corrupt, as all is corruptible.

It appears that there is no hope for this country any more. Its fate is sealed in mediocrity, poverty, and curse. The same is true all over the world, we are all going down. This is nature, decay is inevitable. Death swallows us all.



So lively! So pessimist. Sad but True.








Sunday 3 April 2016

So, did Jesus Lie?



The oldest Christian church claims to be the one true church. They say that they have always been the one and only church established by Jesus Christ. According to them, no one can else can claim to be the true church since they have stayed true to the teachings handed to them by Christ himself.

They also lay claim to the fact that Jesus would never abandon the church he himself built. They cite the passage below.




That would have been all okay, we never would have to have any doubts about the claims of the oldest Christian religious establishment.

However, there is something that needs to be examined. Jesus mentioned the 'other sheep.' and with this other sheep, they will become one flock with one shepherd.


So now, the catholic church has a big problem. They claim to be the oldest and original christian church, so where will this other flock under one shepherd fit in? And since they have always maintained to be the original, meaning from the fold of which these other sheep do not belong, then they have implicitly denied any possibility of the other flock to come into the picture, or existence if i may add. Is this church able to overturn the words of Jesus who they claim as their god? Did Jesus lie about what he said in John 10:16?

And what is a flock anyway?

The flock refers to the Church. According to Christ, the 'other sheep' WILL become one Church with one Shepherd in John 10:16.

But why the need for another flock?



Wolves?


Everyone was sleeping?


What does it mean when everyone is sleeping the enemy or false prophet disguised as a lamb will come and will not spare the flock?


Ah yes. After the crucifixion, the prince of this world will come and destroy the temple, the Church of Christ. 


But they will argue 'what about the promise of Christ to never leave the church?' But has the catholic church stayed true and not altered the teachings of Jesus?

You examine that for yourself. If the teachings have indeed changed, then someone has gotten in and allowed it to happen, the biblical prophecies have then come to pass as surely they would.

So where is the other sheep?

They are now here, and the door is open for anyone no matter the ethnic, social, religious background, All are welcome to come in.